Hello Antech,
Thank you again for your help.
It works now. The variable zoneTempAve output gives temperature in degC.
I have a difference of 2 - 3 degC when I compare with the integration of Paraview. I need to check if the time is the same when I measure the average temperature.
Is it possible ...
Search found 141 matches
- Sat Dec 10, 2022 12:10 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Conjugate heat transfer of simple geometries - comparison with exp data
- Replies: 32
- Views: 43551
- Fri Dec 09, 2022 9:26 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Conjugate heat transfert - 2D - Flow past cylinder
- Replies: 18
- Views: 26755
Re: Conjugate heat transfert - 2D - Flow past cylinder
Hello,
Here is the 2 meshes of the fluid and solid parts if someone wants to try the joining and coupling.
Best regards
Here is the 2 meshes of the fluid and solid parts if someone wants to try the joining and coupling.
Best regards
- Wed Dec 07, 2022 8:51 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Conjugate heat transfer of simple geometries - comparison with exp data
- Replies: 32
- Views: 43551
Re: Conjugate heat transfer of simple geometries - comparison with exp data
Yes it is good now, no more error during compilation!
I don't know how to extract the value now. I try also fprint but everything returns errors...
cs_post_write_var(mesh_id,
CS_POST_WRITER_ALL_ASSOCIATED, /* writer id filter */
"zoneTempAve", /* var_name */
1, /* var_dim */
true ...
I don't know how to extract the value now. I try also fprint but everything returns errors...
cs_post_write_var(mesh_id,
CS_POST_WRITER_ALL_ASSOCIATED, /* writer id filter */
"zoneTempAve", /* var_name */
1, /* var_dim */
true ...
- Wed Dec 07, 2022 3:41 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Conjugate heat transfer of simple geometries - comparison with exp data
- Replies: 32
- Views: 43551
Re: Conjugate heat transfer of simple geometries - comparison with exp data
Hello Antech,
Thank you for your help. I think it is really close to work.
The compiler complains about
/home/julien/Travail/test_cyl4/SRC/cs_user_extra_operations.c:104:25: error: ‘cellVlm’ undeclared (first use in this function)
104 | zoneVlmSum=zoneVlmSum+cellVlm[iCell]; /* Zone volume sum ...
Thank you for your help. I think it is really close to work.
The compiler complains about
/home/julien/Travail/test_cyl4/SRC/cs_user_extra_operations.c:104:25: error: ‘cellVlm’ undeclared (first use in this function)
104 | zoneVlmSum=zoneVlmSum+cellVlm[iCell]; /* Zone volume sum ...
- Wed Dec 07, 2022 8:50 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Conjugate heat transfer of simple geometries - comparison with exp data
- Replies: 32
- Views: 43551
Re: Conjugate heat transfer of simple geometries - comparison with exp data
Hello Antech,
Yes in my case z is related to volume of the "solid" zone
I don't understand where is the link between z defined below
const cs_zone_t *z = cs_volume_zone_by_name("solid");
for (cs_lnum_t idx = 0 ; idx < z->n_elts; ii++)
{
cs_lnum_t ii = z->elt_ids[idx];
temptot += temp->val ...
Yes in my case z is related to volume of the "solid" zone
I don't understand where is the link between z defined below
const cs_zone_t *z = cs_volume_zone_by_name("solid");
for (cs_lnum_t idx = 0 ; idx < z->n_elts; ii++)
{
cs_lnum_t ii = z->elt_ids[idx];
temptot += temp->val ...
- Wed Dec 07, 2022 12:34 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Conjugate heat transfer of simple geometries - comparison with exp data
- Replies: 32
- Views: 43551
Re: Conjugate heat transfer of simple geometries - comparison with exp data
Hello,
One error remains.
/home/julien/Travail/test_cyl4/SRC/cs_user_extra_operations.c:130:18: error: invalid operands to binary / (have ‘cs_real_t’ {aka ‘double’} and ‘const cs_zone_t *’)
130 | Tavg = temptot / z;
| ^
/home/julien/Travail/test_cyl4/SRC/cs_user_extra_operations.c:111:26 ...
One error remains.
/home/julien/Travail/test_cyl4/SRC/cs_user_extra_operations.c:130:18: error: invalid operands to binary / (have ‘cs_real_t’ {aka ‘double’} and ‘const cs_zone_t *’)
130 | Tavg = temptot / z;
| ^
/home/julien/Travail/test_cyl4/SRC/cs_user_extra_operations.c:111:26 ...
- Wed Dec 07, 2022 12:15 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Conjugate heat transfert - 2D - Flow past cylinder
- Replies: 18
- Views: 26755
Re: Conjugate heat transfert - 2D - Flow past cylinder
If I remove from the list of BC one of the two interface BC.
I have a new error message about wall distance.
I have a new error message about wall distance.
- Wed Dec 07, 2022 12:07 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Conjugate heat transfert - 2D - Flow past cylinder
- Replies: 18
- Views: 26755
Re: Conjugate heat transfert - 2D - Flow past cylinder
Hello,
With the join definition syntax:
interface_fs or interface_sl
the join is done but a new problem appears.
Again with some interface definition, see the solver log file
Best regards
With the join definition syntax:
interface_fs or interface_sl
the join is done but a new problem appears.
Again with some interface definition, see the solver log file
Best regards
- Tue Dec 06, 2022 4:28 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Conjugate heat transfer of simple geometries - comparison with exp data
- Replies: 32
- Views: 43551
Re: Conjugate heat transfer of simple geometries - comparison with exp data
Hello Yvan,
Thank you for your answer.
I modify my file. I have a lot of warnings.
First I try to make it works in serial.
There is the modified code
/*============================================================================
* This function is called at the end of each time step, and has a ...
Thank you for your answer.
I modify my file. I have a lot of warnings.
First I try to make it works in serial.
There is the modified code
/*============================================================================
* This function is called at the end of each time step, and has a ...
- Tue Dec 06, 2022 4:07 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Conjugate heat transfert - 2D - Flow past cylinder
- Replies: 18
- Views: 26755
Re: Conjugate heat transfert - 2D - Flow past cylinder
Hello,
With the syntax 'interface_fs' OR 'interface_sf' or without the punctuation interface_fs OR interface_sf
gives exactly the same result.
Maybe my boundary declaration is not appropriate, I have 2 boundaries for the interface solid/ fluid?
Maybe someone has already define a simple case of ...
With the syntax 'interface_fs' OR 'interface_sf' or without the punctuation interface_fs OR interface_sf
gives exactly the same result.
Maybe my boundary declaration is not appropriate, I have 2 boundaries for the interface solid/ fluid?
Maybe someone has already define a simple case of ...