Search found 24 matches

by quarian_engineer
Fri Jun 17, 2016 9:01 am
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: Boundary conditions partition
Replies: 3
Views: 2328

Re: Boundary conditions partition

Hello Yvan and thanks again. I did merge nodes with Salome and it seemed to be ok; but there comes another problem: I defined the boundary groups with Salome as Inlet, Outlet, Airfoil and Farfield. After the export of mesh as a .CGNS file and after running the check mesh, I got the following info fr...
by quarian_engineer
Wed Jun 15, 2016 2:20 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: Boundary conditions partition
Replies: 3
Views: 2328

Boundary conditions partition

Hello again, I have some problems with the definition of boundary conditions in code_saturne. To create the mesh (with Salome 7.6.0) I did some partitions of the flow domain (partition faces are the red lines in the attached screenshot). How can I define the BC's on these faces? If I define them as ...
by quarian_engineer
Fri May 20, 2016 10:40 am
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: Velocity Initialization
Replies: 1
Views: 1808

Velocity Initialization

Hello dear users, Actually I have 2 questions but I wouldn't like to create 2 threads ;) 1) Is there any possibility to initialize different velocities for different zones (e.g. for Inlet and not(inlet)) under "volume conditions" and disable the option "all cells"? If I select ju...
by quarian_engineer
Wed Apr 13, 2016 1:49 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: BC error (BC does not correspond to any boundary face)
Replies: 6
Views: 2032

Re: BC error (BC does not correspond to any boundary face)

Finally I solved the problem. I forgot to define only one face which belongs to my wing blade and this was causing the error. But now it works!
by quarian_engineer
Wed Apr 13, 2016 1:14 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: BC error (BC does not correspond to any boundary face)
Replies: 6
Views: 2032

Re: BC error (BC does not correspond to any boundary face)

...or maybe do you know how do I export the mesh from Ansys Fluent in code_saturne with correctly defined BC's?
by quarian_engineer
Wed Apr 13, 2016 9:57 am
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: BC error (BC does not correspond to any boundary face)
Replies: 6
Views: 2032

Re: BC error (BC does not correspond to any boundary face)

Hello, Actually I gave the same names of boundaries while creating "named selections" (with only the first letter as a capital letter). Anyway I changed the definition of boundary regions in code_saturne to capital letters only; but unfortunately it didn't solve the problem. I'll search fo...
by quarian_engineer
Tue Apr 12, 2016 11:20 am
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: BC error (BC does not correspond to any boundary face)
Replies: 6
Views: 2032

Re: BC error (BC does not correspond to any boundary face)

Hello Yvan and thanks for an answer. - So, my version of code_saturne is 4.0 - Hier is my preprocessor.log: preprocessor.log - listing: https://www.dropbox.com/s/zfl9exqa4t414j1/listing?dl=0 - And mesh: https://www.dropbox.com/s/6o4et3524xktmqm/Mesh_3_m.cgns?dl=0 (by some reason I cant put these fil...
by quarian_engineer
Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:53 am
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: BC error (BC does not correspond to any boundary face)
Replies: 6
Views: 2032

BC error (BC does not correspond to any boundary face)

Dear users, Recently I run a simulation for a turbine blade using a mesh generated with Salome and it worked quite well, but the mesh was actually not really "good" (some non-orthogonal cells, skewness at boundary/viscous layers, etc.) The mesh was imported in code_saturne as a .MED file. ...
by quarian_engineer
Thu Jan 28, 2016 4:09 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: View of initial conditions
Replies: 2
Views: 1052

Re: View of initial conditions

Yes it worked :) Thanks.
by quarian_engineer
Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:20 am
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: View of initial conditions
Replies: 2
Views: 1052

View of initial conditions

Hello dear users,

is there a possibility in code_saturne to view the initial conditions in Paraview, like this results.case?

Thanks in advance
S.