Search found 4226 matches
- Fri Jun 13, 2025 6:30 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Question about the convergence of LES calculations
- Replies: 3
- Views: 551
Re: Question about the convergence of LES calculations
Hello, Sometimes, just a few pinched cells can cause issues, but It is hard to tell without looking at your mesh. Would it be feasible an LES on a simpler mesh, or a truncated version of this one in which you have only the "good" cells, to see if this works better, or if the issue is relat...
- Thu Jun 12, 2025 12:24 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Question about the convergence of LES calculations
- Replies: 3
- Views: 551
Re: Question about the convergence of LES calculations
Hello, What type of meshes do you use ? LES in code_saturne can be quite sensitive to mesh quality and regularity. In a similar way, though centered convection schemes are needed for the conservation of energy, a very small portion of upwind (2%) might help stabilize the computation. Best regards, Y...
- Thu Jun 12, 2025 1:57 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: y+ value for k-e wall function with high roughness
- Replies: 1
- Views: 753
Re: y+ value for k-e wall function with high roughness
Hello, The guidelines are a good starting point, but need updating, and do not take into account some newer options such as the all-y+ law (in k-omega) or low-Reynolds models. I do not think they were written with the rough law model in mind, as the roughness adds an amount of user modeling, and the...
- Tue Jun 10, 2025 1:30 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: SIGSEGV signal issue
- Replies: 1
- Views: 874
Re: SIGSEGV signal issue
Hello, It is not possible to determine whether this is due to an issue in the code or in you user-defined functions, so you need to: - ideally, run this under under a debugger on your side, to get more details - otherwise, post you user-defined files. Also, v7.0.2 is not up to date, so you should up...
- Fri Jun 06, 2025 12:20 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Groundwater Module - Neumann Boundary Condition Issue
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1314
Re: Groundwater Module - Neumann Boundary Condition Issue
Hello, Do you also have some user-defined functions ? Checking with a colleague developing this, your Van Genuchten ks value seems a bit high (in clay, it would be closer to 1e-2 or lower). Also, the groundwater module used in the v8.0 GUI is obsolete, and replaced by the CDO-based module in v9.0. (...
- Tue Jun 03, 2025 10:46 pm
- Forum: Discussion
- Topic: K-omega documentation and initialization
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2051
Re: K-omega documentation and initialization
Hello, The level of detail in the theory guide is unfortunately far from uniform, and some subtle implementation differences in turbulence models might not be documented (or the matching elements may be spread out over many technical reports, bugtracker issues, ... or change logs, which makes it bas...
- Wed May 28, 2025 6:17 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: defining boundary condition on user selected interior faces
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3247
Re: defining boundary condition on user selected interior faces
Hello, If faces are joined for periodicity, they become interior faces, so should be selectable as interior (not boundary) faces. Combining periodicity and boundary face insertion would be another matter, as periodic faces are interior faces but one of their adjacent cell is a ghost cell, without an...
- Wed May 28, 2025 2:37 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: defining boundary condition on user selected interior faces
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3247
Re: defining boundary condition on user selected interior faces
Hello, It is strange that the number of interior faces seems to decrease but the number of boundary faces remains constant. I recommend testing this with a current version of the code (v8.0 or example, or v9.0 beta). Also, you can create an additional postprocessing mesh based on you selection crite...
- Mon May 26, 2025 7:05 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: How to Manage Separate Monitoring Outputs with Multiple Probe Files
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3564
Re: How to Manage Separate Monitoring Outputs with Multiple Probe Files
Hello, To use different directories, you need to create one writer per directory, using cs_post_define_writer (where you can define a separate directory for each writer) , then use "cs_probe_set_associate_writers" to assign a different writer for each probe set. In any case, if you really ...
- Mon May 26, 2025 5:58 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: How to Manage Separate Monitoring Outputs with Multiple Probe Files
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3564
Re: How to Manage Separate Monitoring Outputs with Multiple Probe Files
Hello,
You cannot define the same function in multiple files, but you can define multiple probe sets in a single cs_user_postprocess_probes function.
If you have many similar probe sets, I recommend declaring them in a loop rather than copy/pasting the same instructions.
Best regards,
Yvan
You cannot define the same function in multiple files, but you can define multiple probe sets in a single cs_user_postprocess_probes function.
If you have many similar probe sets, I recommend declaring them in a loop rather than copy/pasting the same instructions.
Best regards,
Yvan