Hello Yvan,
Actually i noticed that this error appears only when i try to run a case which involves the C++ implementation of PyTorch (i'm trying to run an ANN inference inside the code). To test it, i tried to run a case without implementing PyTorch and with the same code configuration, and the ...
Search found 40 matches
- Mon Jul 21, 2025 3:36 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: ParMETIS not found
- Replies: 3
- Views: 58572
- Fri Jul 18, 2025 4:49 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: ParMETIS not found
- Replies: 3
- Views: 58572
ParMETIS not found
Hello,
I'm trying to run a case where mesh partitioning is required and i have the following error:
/home/cenvinzf@coria.fr/Desktop/code_saturne_coria-HuuTri_dev/code_saturne/src/mesh/cs_partition.c:2934: Fatal error.
Partitioning with METIS required but neither
ParMETIS nor METIS is available ...
I'm trying to run a case where mesh partitioning is required and i have the following error:
/home/cenvinzf@coria.fr/Desktop/code_saturne_coria-HuuTri_dev/code_saturne/src/mesh/cs_partition.c:2934: Fatal error.
Partitioning with METIS required but neither
ParMETIS nor METIS is available ...
- Tue May 20, 2025 4:42 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Mass fraction conversion with combustion module
- Replies: 3
- Views: 10678
Re: Mass fraction conversion with combustion module
Hello,
I found a function called cs_combustion_gas_yg2xye that does partially what i wanted. I managed to call it correctly in my user subroutines but it doesn't actually give me the field of values but rather what i suppose being the average.
Is it me to not have understood correctly how the ...
I found a function called cs_combustion_gas_yg2xye that does partially what i wanted. I managed to call it correctly in my user subroutines but it doesn't actually give me the field of values but rather what i suppose being the average.
Is it me to not have understood correctly how the ...
- Wed May 14, 2025 7:56 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Mass fraction conversion with combustion module
- Replies: 3
- Views: 10678
Mass fraction conversion with combustion module
Hello everyone,
I am running a simple case with the combustion module on and i was wondering if there is any function present in the code to eventually convert the ym_fuel, ym_oxyd and ym_prod to the actual mass fractions of the components of the mixture (e.g., in the case of methane combustion ...
I am running a simple case with the combustion module on and i was wondering if there is any function present in the code to eventually convert the ym_fuel, ym_oxyd and ym_prod to the actual mass fractions of the components of the mixture (e.g., in the case of methane combustion ...
- Tue Mar 25, 2025 12:58 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Problem when replacing fields during RANS with combustion module on
- Replies: 4
- Views: 23619
Re: Problem when replacing fields during RANS with combustion module on
Hello Yvan,
Thanks for the tip on the temperature and the density. From what i understood you think the possible "explosion" of the pressure values may also be attributed to the wrong density algorithm chosen, am i right?
I will now try to see what happens in both cases with idilat set to 2 and ...
Thanks for the tip on the temperature and the density. From what i understood you think the possible "explosion" of the pressure values may also be attributed to the wrong density algorithm chosen, am i right?
I will now try to see what happens in both cases with idilat set to 2 and ...
- Tue Mar 18, 2025 12:27 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Problem when replacing fields during RANS with combustion module on
- Replies: 4
- Views: 23619
Re: Problem when replacing fields during RANS with combustion module on
Hello Yvan,
I'm trying to turn off density, temperature and mass fraction calculations (those for ym_fuel, ym_oxyd and ym_prod). Should i be checking then in scalai.f90? I saw that the routine calls upon covofi for resolution of the scalars, hence i run some checks in covofi.f90 and this was the ...
I'm trying to turn off density, temperature and mass fraction calculations (those for ym_fuel, ym_oxyd and ym_prod). Should i be checking then in scalai.f90? I saw that the routine calls upon covofi for resolution of the scalars, hence i run some checks in covofi.f90 and this was the ...
- Thu Mar 13, 2025 11:18 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Problem when replacing fields during RANS with combustion module on
- Replies: 4
- Views: 23619
Problem when replacing fields during RANS with combustion module on
Hello everyone,
I'm trying to run a simulation of a simple combustion case where after a certain number of iterations, calculation of certain fields is "moved" to a certain subroutine, that implements a neural network. The newly computed fields are then used to replace the actual CFD fields inside ...
I'm trying to run a simulation of a simple combustion case where after a certain number of iterations, calculation of certain fields is "moved" to a certain subroutine, that implements a neural network. The newly computed fields are then used to replace the actual CFD fields inside ...
- Thu Jan 30, 2025 2:52 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: MPI fail on multiprocess run
- Replies: 3
- Views: 21026
Re: MPI fail on multiprocess run
Hello,
I actually managed to sort the bug out, as the command i was using to launch the code was not passing the correct number of processors needed to perform the computation.
Regards,
Francesco
I actually managed to sort the bug out, as the command i was using to launch the code was not passing the correct number of processors needed to perform the computation.
Regards,
Francesco
- Wed Jan 29, 2025 7:00 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: MPI fail on multiprocess run
- Replies: 3
- Views: 21026
MPI fail on multiprocess run
Hello,
I'm trying to run a case on a multiprocess setup, but whatever the amount of processors i provide it always gives me back:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
MPI_ABORT was invoked on rank 0 in communicator MPI_COMM_WORLD
with errorcode 1.
NOTE ...
I'm trying to run a case on a multiprocess setup, but whatever the amount of processors i provide it always gives me back:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
MPI_ABORT was invoked on rank 0 in communicator MPI_COMM_WORLD
with errorcode 1.
NOTE ...
- Mon Jan 13, 2025 8:50 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: NaN values when passing from a subroutine to another
- Replies: 1
- Views: 13782
NaN values when passing from a subroutine to another
Hello,
I'm trying to run a C++ function within a cs_user_physical_properties.f90 subroutine. Everything has been implemented just fine following how this C++/Fortran coupling is done in other standard routines, but i don't get why when passing fields from the fortran to C++ NaN values will appear ...
I'm trying to run a C++ function within a cs_user_physical_properties.f90 subroutine. Everything has been implemented just fine following how this C++/Fortran coupling is done in other standard routines, but i don't get why when passing fields from the fortran to C++ NaN values will appear ...