Problem with scalar initialisation CSv6 alpha
Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 10:59 pm
Dear CS developpers,
I am migrating from version 3.0 to version 6 and I tried to recreate a case using the atmospheric module with the RANS model and adding a scalar. The results for the flow seem to be coherent between the two versions, however, there is an issue with the initialisation of the scalar field in the version 6.1-alpha. I have attached an image of the start of the simulation (t=0) where you can see a "block" of cells that contains a mass but in my setup file I have set the initial value to 0 for all cells.
Unfortunately I currently cannot pull the latest version from Git because I do not have enough administrator rights in the server (IT representative currently on holidays), but I would like to discard the possibility of a mistake in the setup.xml, the cs_user_mass_source_terms.f90 , or maybe you have already adressed this issue in the latest developments. I have attached the mentioned files as well as the listing output in the compressed file.
Thank you for your support,
Marcia
I am migrating from version 3.0 to version 6 and I tried to recreate a case using the atmospheric module with the RANS model and adding a scalar. The results for the flow seem to be coherent between the two versions, however, there is an issue with the initialisation of the scalar field in the version 6.1-alpha. I have attached an image of the start of the simulation (t=0) where you can see a "block" of cells that contains a mass but in my setup file I have set the initial value to 0 for all cells.
Unfortunately I currently cannot pull the latest version from Git because I do not have enough administrator rights in the server (IT representative currently on holidays), but I would like to discard the possibility of a mistake in the setup.xml, the cs_user_mass_source_terms.f90 , or maybe you have already adressed this issue in the latest developments. I have attached the mentioned files as well as the listing output in the compressed file.
Thank you for your support,
Marcia