Page 1 of 1

Usage advice compressible vs low-mach

Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 2:03 pm
by mortbauer
Can somebody maybe point out the major difference between the low-mach algorithm idilat=3 vs the compressible module. And is there any documentation for the low-mach algorithm?

Thanks.

Re: Usage advice compressible vs low-mach

Posted: Mon May 12, 2014 4:10 pm
by Erwan Le Coupanec
Hello,

you first should take a look at the Mach number, if M > 0.3, the compressible module should be used.

If M < 0.3, but the density variations are such that and the pressure variations are rather slow, you can consider using the low-Mach algorithm. Typically if your flow is in a closed domain with a slowly increasing pressure.

Regards,

Erwan Le Coupanec

Re: Usage advice compressible vs low-mach

Posted: Mon May 12, 2014 4:33 pm
by mortbauer
I guess my question was a bit to general. I of course know that below a Mach number of 0.3 it is considered to be incompressible and vice versa. Actually I did run calculations with both possibilities. The problem with the idilat variant is that it highly instable, because I wanna model the density with the ideal gas law which obviously couples the density and the pressure. The big pressure differences actually arises due to a rotating reference frame. I actually may have found some workaround for that now by not using the actual pressure but the kinetic energy which is the actual reason for the pressure differences.