Can somebody maybe point out the major difference between the low-mach algorithm idilat=3 vs the compressible module. And is there any documentation for the low-mach algorithm?
Thanks.
Usage advice compressible vs low-mach
Forum rules
Please read the forum usage recommendations before posting.
Please read the forum usage recommendations before posting.
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 8:50 pm
Re: Usage advice compressible vs low-mach
Hello,
you first should take a look at the Mach number, if M > 0.3, the compressible module should be used.
If M < 0.3, but the density variations are such that
and the pressure variations are rather slow, you can consider using the low-Mach algorithm. Typically if your flow is in a closed domain with a slowly increasing pressure.
Regards,
Erwan Le Coupanec
you first should take a look at the Mach number, if M > 0.3, the compressible module should be used.
If M < 0.3, but the density variations are such that
Regards,
Erwan Le Coupanec
Re: Usage advice compressible vs low-mach
I guess my question was a bit to general. I of course know that below a Mach number of 0.3 it is considered to be incompressible and vice versa. Actually I did run calculations with both possibilities. The problem with the idilat variant is that it highly instable, because I wanna model the density with the ideal gas law which obviously couples the density and the pressure. The big pressure differences actually arises due to a rotating reference frame. I actually may have found some workaround for that now by not using the actual pressure but the kinetic energy which is the actual reason for the pressure differences.