Hello,
The guidelines are a good starting point, but need updating, and do not take into account some newer options such as the all-y+ law (in k-omega) or low-Reynolds models.
I do not think they were written with the rough law model in mind, as the roughness adds an amount of user modeling, and ...
Search found 4234 matches
- Thu Jun 12, 2025 1:57 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: y+ value for k-e wall function with high roughness
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8482
- Tue Jun 10, 2025 1:30 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: SIGSEGV signal issue
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2415
Re: SIGSEGV signal issue
Hello,
It is not possible to determine whether this is due to an issue in the code or in you user-defined functions, so you need to:
- ideally, run this under under a debugger on your side, to get more details
- otherwise, post you user-defined files.
Also, v7.0.2 is not up to date, so you should ...
It is not possible to determine whether this is due to an issue in the code or in you user-defined functions, so you need to:
- ideally, run this under under a debugger on your side, to get more details
- otherwise, post you user-defined files.
Also, v7.0.2 is not up to date, so you should ...
- Fri Jun 06, 2025 12:20 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Groundwater Module - Neumann Boundary Condition Issue
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2618
Re: Groundwater Module - Neumann Boundary Condition Issue
Hello,
Do you also have some user-defined functions ?
Checking with a colleague developing this, your Van Genuchten ks value seems a bit high (in clay, it would be closer to 1e-2 or lower).
Also, the groundwater module used in the v8.0 GUI is obsolete, and replaced by the CDO-based module in v9.0 ...
Do you also have some user-defined functions ?
Checking with a colleague developing this, your Van Genuchten ks value seems a bit high (in clay, it would be closer to 1e-2 or lower).
Also, the groundwater module used in the v8.0 GUI is obsolete, and replaced by the CDO-based module in v9.0 ...
- Tue Jun 03, 2025 10:46 pm
- Forum: Discussion
- Topic: K-omega documentation and initialization
- Replies: 1
- Views: 6456
Re: K-omega documentation and initialization
Hello,
The level of detail in the theory guide is unfortunately far from uniform, and some subtle implementation differences in turbulence models might not be documented (or the matching elements may be spread out over many technical reports, bugtracker issues, ... or change logs, which makes it ...
The level of detail in the theory guide is unfortunately far from uniform, and some subtle implementation differences in turbulence models might not be documented (or the matching elements may be spread out over many technical reports, bugtracker issues, ... or change logs, which makes it ...
- Wed May 28, 2025 6:17 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: defining boundary condition on user selected interior faces
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4107
Re: defining boundary condition on user selected interior faces
Hello,
If faces are joined for periodicity, they become interior faces, so should be selectable as interior (not boundary) faces.
Combining periodicity and boundary face insertion would be another matter, as periodic faces are interior faces but one of their adjacent cell is a ghost cell, without ...
If faces are joined for periodicity, they become interior faces, so should be selectable as interior (not boundary) faces.
Combining periodicity and boundary face insertion would be another matter, as periodic faces are interior faces but one of their adjacent cell is a ghost cell, without ...
- Wed May 28, 2025 2:37 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: defining boundary condition on user selected interior faces
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4107
Re: defining boundary condition on user selected interior faces
Hello,
It is strange that the number of interior faces seems to decrease but the number of boundary faces remains constant.
I recommend testing this with a current version of the code (v8.0 or example, or v9.0 beta). Also, you can create an additional postprocessing mesh based on you selection ...
It is strange that the number of interior faces seems to decrease but the number of boundary faces remains constant.
I recommend testing this with a current version of the code (v8.0 or example, or v9.0 beta). Also, you can create an additional postprocessing mesh based on you selection ...
- Mon May 26, 2025 7:05 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: How to Manage Separate Monitoring Outputs with Multiple Probe Files
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4150
Re: How to Manage Separate Monitoring Outputs with Multiple Probe Files
Hello,
To use different directories, you need to create one writer per directory, using cs_post_define_writer (where you can define a separate directory for each writer) , then use "cs_probe_set_associate_writers" to assign a different writer for each probe set.
In any case, if you really have a ...
To use different directories, you need to create one writer per directory, using cs_post_define_writer (where you can define a separate directory for each writer) , then use "cs_probe_set_associate_writers" to assign a different writer for each probe set.
In any case, if you really have a ...
- Mon May 26, 2025 5:58 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: How to Manage Separate Monitoring Outputs with Multiple Probe Files
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4150
Re: How to Manage Separate Monitoring Outputs with Multiple Probe Files
Hello,
You cannot define the same function in multiple files, but you can define multiple probe sets in a single cs_user_postprocess_probes function.
If you have many similar probe sets, I recommend declaring them in a loop rather than copy/pasting the same instructions.
Best regards,
Yvan
You cannot define the same function in multiple files, but you can define multiple probe sets in a single cs_user_postprocess_probes function.
If you have many similar probe sets, I recommend declaring them in a loop rather than copy/pasting the same instructions.
Best regards,
Yvan
- Sat May 24, 2025 7:58 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Mass fraction conversion with combustion module
- Replies: 3
- Views: 9974
Re: Mass fraction conversion with combustion module
Hello,
This conversion function (and similar ones) are called in loops over all cells, so do not work over a full field, but only local values. You simply need to use it in a loop.
Best regards,
Yvan
This conversion function (and similar ones) are called in loops over all cells, so do not work over a full field, but only local values. You simply need to use it in a loop.
Best regards,
Yvan
- Fri May 23, 2025 1:47 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Current implementation of synthetic eddy method
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5661
Re: Current implementation of synthetic eddy method
Hello,
I just relayed this question to Sofiane Benhamadouche a few minutes ago, and is seems that the code may have evolved a bit, and it would actually be helpful for everybody if someone took to time to dive into the code in our SEM implementation to check / update the equations relative to ...
I just relayed this question to Sofiane Benhamadouche a few minutes ago, and is seems that the code may have evolved a bit, and it would actually be helpful for everybody if someone took to time to dive into the code in our SEM implementation to check / update the equations relative to ...