Search found 48 matches
- Sun Dec 20, 2020 2:02 pm
- Forum: Discussion
- Topic: Documentation of rough wall boundary conditions
- Replies: 5
- Views: 23166
Re: Documentation of rough wall boundary conditions
To try again on this... For something simple... I assume that the C_log that appears in Eq. I.5.25 should be removed and was a typo? For default k-epsilon, for example, looking through the code, the friction velocity is called uk, and is determined from the value of k, using the theoretical log-lay...
- Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:10 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Solution control, fluid properties
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1901
Re: Solution control, fluid properties
The problem was noticed with VOF enabled in v6.0. I am able to replicate it with v6.2.0. In some sense, perhaps it is logical to always save the fluid properties for VOF. But in this case, it is strange from a user interface point of view if the checkbox in the volume solution control panel does not...
- Fri Oct 23, 2020 1:07 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Solution control, fluid properties
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1901
Solution control, fluid properties
When looking at the output files, is it normal that one cannot turn off the density and molecular_viscosity fields from the default writer? For some test cases, in order to save space, I un-check the fluid properties from the "post-processing" list in the volume solution control, but the f...
- Wed Oct 21, 2020 1:56 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Creating new studies in a folder with the same name
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2252
Re: Creating new studies in a folder with the same name
It appears to be defined in the first line of the create() function of class Study of bin/cs_create.py
I presume that it is to assume that the user just wants to create a new case in an existing study, but in my case, the assumption was wrong
I presume that it is to assume that the user just wants to create a new case in an existing study, but in my case, the assumption was wrong
- Wed Oct 21, 2020 12:19 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Creating new studies in a folder with the same name
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2252
Creating new studies in a folder with the same name
It seems that one cannot explicitly create a new study if the study name is identical to the name of the current folder. Are there any plans for this to change, or is this behavior documented somewhere? (Or could at least a warning be printed? -- it does not seem ideal from the user experience side ...
- Sun Apr 05, 2020 12:14 pm
- Forum: Discussion
- Topic: Documentation, "4.5 Advanced topic"
- Replies: 3
- Views: 28499
- Sun Apr 05, 2020 12:13 pm
- Forum: Discussion
- Topic: User meeting schedule
- Replies: 7
- Views: 20347
Re: User meeting schedule
Ok, thanks.
- Wed Mar 25, 2020 8:18 pm
- Forum: Discussion
- Topic: User meeting schedule
- Replies: 7
- Views: 20347
User meeting schedule
Are there any plans to delay or cancel the user meeting, or at this point will the same date be kept, if the situation with Covid-19 permits it?
- Tue Mar 17, 2020 3:11 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Breaking the GUI
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3257
Re: Breaking the GUI
Ah, okay, apparently it was just a temporary bug ; some earlier and more recent versions work fine.
- Tue Mar 17, 2020 1:55 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Breaking the GUI
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3257
Re: Breaking the GUI
Version: 6.1-alpha-3d40cb102