Search found 26 matches

by antoineb
Thu Apr 16, 2020 3:41 pm
Forum: Installation issues
Topic: Error building with Catalyst support
Replies: 24
Views: 18515

Re: Error building with Catalyst support

I built again with MPI, and it works !
Thanks Yvan :D

I have one small issue, which is the images won't go in the folder set in code_saturne writers tab. Do you know why ? The folder gets created, but the images are in the root result folder of the run.

Best regards,
Antoine
by antoineb
Thu Apr 16, 2020 2:26 pm
Forum: Installation issues
Topic: Error building with Catalyst support
Replies: 24
Views: 18515

Re: Error building with Catalyst support

Good catch !

I forgot the mpi flag in CS configure... My bad !

Trying again...
by antoineb
Thu Apr 16, 2020 1:29 pm
Forum: Installation issues
Topic: Error building with Catalyst support
Replies: 24
Views: 18515

Re: Error building with Catalyst support

Hi Yvan, I did build Paraview with MPI support. I'm using Paraview 5.6.3 and Code_Saturne 6.0.2, both with MPI support. I did not manage to get the Salome paraview to work for building Code_Saturne if that was your question. Are you saying that the issue I had means Paraview was not built with MPI s...
by antoineb
Thu Apr 16, 2020 11:09 am
Forum: Installation issues
Topic: Error building with Catalyst support
Replies: 24
Views: 18515

Re: Error building with Catalyst support

UPDATE 1 : In file "fvm_to_catalyst.cxx", line 397, in "src" folder, replacing : #if defined(HAVE_MPI) static void _init_coprocessor(bool private_comm, MPI_Comm comm) #else _init_coprocessor(void) #endif With : #if defined(HAVE_MPI) static void _init_coprocessor(bool private_com...
by antoineb
Thu Apr 16, 2020 10:53 am
Forum: Installation issues
Topic: Error building with Catalyst support
Replies: 24
Views: 18515

Error building with Catalyst support

Hi all, I'm having a bit of trouble installing Code_saturne 6.0.2 with Catalyst support. I built Paraview 5.6.3 with catalyst and python flags activated, as well as install files flag. I then used "make" and "make install", but when I provide the installation path to CS, I have t...
by antoineb
Wed Mar 25, 2020 6:51 pm
Forum: Installation issues
Topic: [Solved] Error with SALOME "CFDSTUDY_GenSK.cc"
Replies: 4
Views: 4031

Re: Error with SALOME "CFDSTUDY_GenSK.cc"

Hi Yvan,

I did what you mentioned in the cfd_study and fsi_coupling dirs, and it worked perfect in salome context !

Thanks !
Antoine
by antoineb
Wed Mar 25, 2020 3:23 pm
Forum: Installation issues
Topic: [Solved] Error with SALOME "CFDSTUDY_GenSK.cc"
Replies: 4
Views: 4031

Re: Error with SALOME "CFDSTUDY_GenSK.cc"

Hello Yvan, Thanks for the quick reply ! You can find the makefile attached. Unfortunately, I already tried to do the install without the --with-salome flag, and I have the exact same issue, as soon as I'm in "salome context". I wanted to use the matching python version for HDF5, MED and C...
by antoineb
Tue Mar 24, 2020 12:13 pm
Forum: Installation issues
Topic: [Solved] Error with SALOME "CFDSTUDY_GenSK.cc"
Replies: 4
Views: 4031

[Solved] Error with SALOME "CFDSTUDY_GenSK.cc"

Hello all, When trying to install latest CS 6.0.2 with latest SALOME 9.4 to make use of HDF5, MED, CGNS and CFDSTUDY module, I'm facing this error during compile stage : Making all in salome make[2] : on entre dans le répertoire « /home/antoine/Téléchargements/code_saturne-6.0.2.build/salome » Makin...
by antoineb
Mon Oct 14, 2019 12:46 am
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: SIGSEGV signal writing results in extra operations
Replies: 7
Views: 4284

Re: SIGSEGV signal writing results in extra operations

Finally got it working on a google cloud VM, but on Debian 9.11 instead of Ubuntu 19.04...
I did everything exactly the same, but all the subroutines and post calculation operations are ok now !

Best regards,

Antoine
by antoineb
Sun Oct 13, 2019 6:11 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: SIGSEGV signal writing results in extra operations
Replies: 7
Views: 4284

Re: SIGSEGV signal writing results in extra operations

Hello again, After two clean installs (with f95 and gfortran as f compiler) I still have issues. I inserted a simple : write(nfecra,*) “here we are” Just before the call to user_extra_operations_initialize() in inivar.f90, and i do get the "here we are" line in the listing. With this basic...