Search found 148 matches
- Sun Jul 11, 2021 5:52 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: ALE implicit iterations
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2433
Re: ALE implicit iterations
Hello, Thanks for the reply. My "implicit" is from the mesh deformation point of view: instead of deforming the mesh just once per time step and then jumping to the following time step, I would like to iterate several mesh deformations within the same time step in order to achieve converge...
- Thu Jul 08, 2021 11:12 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: ALE implicit iterations
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2433
ALE implicit iterations
Hello, In the frame of an ALE simulation, I use the cs_user_boundary_conditions-ale.f90 to impose a given displacement for the nodes of a wall. The cs_user_boundary_conditions-ale.f90 is read once at the beginning of each time step. The code performs the time step, then jumps to the following one an...
- Tue May 25, 2021 9:41 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: ALE implicit coupling error with EBRSM
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4459
Re: ALE implicit coupling error with EBRSM
Hello, Unfortunately there is no error file created beside the one describing exactly the same error found in the listing. The output file of the batch job gives the following error message (I have no error file created): ********************** Starting calculation ********************** -----------...
- Fri May 21, 2021 8:58 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: ALE implicit coupling error with EBRSM
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4459
Re: ALE implicit coupling error with EBRSM
Sorry I didn't get what you meant. The error file contains exactly the call stack details shown in my previous post. I had a look inside the run_solver.log and actually found something more: SIGTERM signal (termination) received. --> computation interrupted by environment. Call stack: 1: 0x2ab30488c...
- Fri May 21, 2021 5:34 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: ALE implicit coupling error with EBRSM
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4459
Re: ALE implicit coupling error with EBRSM
Hello Yvan, Thank you for your answer. I copied the error in my previous post, but maybe it was not uploaded... I copy it here again: Call stack: 1: 0x2ac8d66da748 <strdep_+0xdd3> (libsaturne-6.0.so) 2: 0x2ac8d66e17af <tridim_+0x40df> (libsaturne-6.0.so) 3: 0x2ac8d655ffd2 <caltri_+0x20f2> (libsaturn...
- Fri May 21, 2021 4:28 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Lapack with v6
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4501
Re: Lapack with v6
Thank you very much Yvan.
I managed to properly link Lapack!
Best regards,
Daniele
I managed to properly link Lapack!
Best regards,
Daniele
- Fri May 21, 2021 4:27 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: ALE implicit coupling error with EBRSM
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4459
ALE implicit coupling error with EBRSM
Hello, I am facing always the same error as soon as I activate the ALE implicit coupling with a EBRSM simulation: Call stack: 1: 0x2ac8d66da748 <strdep_+0xdd3> (libsaturne-6.0.so) 2: 0x2ac8d66e17af <tridim_+0x40df> (libsaturne-6.0.so) 3: 0x2ac8d655ffd2 <caltri_+0x20f2> (libsaturne-6.0.so) 4: 0x2ac8d...
- Tue Apr 20, 2021 3:01 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Lapack with v6
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4501
Re: Lapack with v6
Hello Yvan,
Thank you very much for your help.
I am not very good in compiling stuff, could you please help me further: what do I have to specify exactly for domain.compile_...? The location of the Lapack libraries etc?
Thanks a lot for your time.
Best regards,
Daniele
Thank you very much for your help.
I am not very good in compiling stuff, could you please help me further: what do I have to specify exactly for domain.compile_...? The location of the Lapack libraries etc?
Thanks a lot for your time.
Best regards,
Daniele
- Wed Apr 07, 2021 9:57 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: ALE simulation v5.0.3 vs v6.0.2 discrepancy
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1611
ALE simulation v5.0.3 vs v6.0.2 discrepancy
Hello, I have some problems in understanding the behavior of different versions of code_Saturne with ALE internal coupling simulations. I have performed a lot of ALE with internal coupling simulations with v5.0.3 in a quite straightforward way, without encountering inconsistencies. I switched to v6....
- Tue Mar 09, 2021 11:14 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Lapack with v6
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4501
Lapack with v6
Hello, I would like to perform matrix operations inside a fortran user subroutine, with code_saturne v6. I need Lapack. I read a post in this forum discussing how to install code_saturne v2 with Lapack. What is the procedure you reccomend with v6? Thank you very much for your help. Best regards, Dan...