code_saturne User's Forum

Hello Yvan,

Thank you!!
I will try to do it one on my own taking inspiration from the one you posted.

For the same purpose, Can I use as well cs_user_extra_operations.f90 (maybe the name is a bit different in the last versions)?

Regards,

FA

Hello, Files directly from the batch systems are, in my case, with extension .e1385884 and o.01385884 which are empty and I have not attached. Anyway I solved the problem by adding mpirun at the command to the binary cs_solver in run_solver. I called then the run_solver to the batch script (see it a...

Dear all, I would like to know from you upon the setting up of the Coriolis Source Terms through the GUI (version 5.0.8). I am modeling a model tidal turbine: My domain consists of two parts (cell zones): rotating domain (with a turbine in it ), stationary domain (rest of the tank). No interface exi...

Hi Yvan, I have attached the run_solver as well as the performance.log and setup.log. I didn't have any particular messages when submitting neither in the batch log files. At the moment I am waiting for a simulation to start: I added mpirun at the line of the command of cs_solver in the run_solver. ...

Dear all, I am facing an issue regarding a parallel batch job. The batch system is SGE. Although in my script there is the option to run my job in parallel: #$ -l nodes=2, once the job starts running is still serial! I also tried to add --mpi at the call to run the job; in my case: /scratch/hpc/25/a...

Dear all, I am setting up a steady simulation of a model tidal turbine in a tank. My computational domain consists of two part: rotating cylindrical domain including a turbine + a rectangular cross section tank (stationary part). A non-conformal interface exists between these two parts. I have chose...

Hello Thank you! Is the "explicit coupling" an option available in the GUI with the newest development versions? Now I am using the version 5.0.8. I will try to couple the "tank" domain with the "rotating" one through the user subroutines. By doing this, Am I able to pe...

maybe the image attached of the BC_type can tell something.
few blue patches may indicate where the error occurred: It looks that at the interface between the two domains some faces did not match; I am not sure about this statement though.

Regards,

federico

Hi Yvan,

I opened the ERROR.case with Paraview but I do know exactly what to visualize.
I can just see the BC_type...

Regards,

FA

Hi Yvan,

I do not why I solved that issue simply setting up again the case from scratch..and deleting the old one!
I will give you of course more information whether I come across this error in the future.

Regards,

FA