code_saturne User's Forum

To try again on this...  For something simple... I assume that the C_log that appears in Eq. I.5.25 should be removed and was a typo? For default k-epsilon, for example, looking through the code, the friction velocity is called uk, and is determined from the value of k, using the theoretical log-lay...

The problem was noticed with VOF enabled in v6.0. I am able to replicate it with v6.2.0. In some sense, perhaps it is logical to always save the fluid properties for VOF. But in this case, it is strange from a user interface point of view if the checkbox in the volume solution control panel does not...

When looking at the output files, is it normal that one cannot turn off the density and molecular_viscosity fields from the default writer? For some test cases, in order to save space, I un-check the fluid properties from the "post-processing" list in the volume solution control, but the f...

It appears to be defined in the first line of the create() function of class Study of bin/cs_create.py

I presume that it is to assume that the user just wants to create a new case in an existing study, but in my case, the assumption was wrong

It seems that one cannot explicitly create a new study if the study name is identical to the name of the current folder. Are there any plans for this to change, or is this behavior documented somewhere? (Or could at least a warning be printed? -- it does not seem ideal from the user experience side ...

...?

Ok, thanks.

Are there any plans to delay or cancel the user meeting, or at this point will the same date be kept, if the situation with Covid-19 permits it?

Ah, okay, apparently it was just a temporary bug ; some earlier and more recent versions work fine.

Version: 6.1-alpha-3d40cb102