Search found 149 matches

by daniele
Wed Sep 22, 2021 2:02 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: issues with user routine parallelization
Replies: 7
Views: 6131

issues with user routine parallelization

Hello, I hope somebody can help me in understanding some specific issues related to parallelization of user routines. I am trying to store inside an array the face index of the faces of a given mesh boundary (called CYL_WALL). Things are easy for a serial simulation, become more complex for parallel...
by daniele
Sun Jul 11, 2021 5:52 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: ALE implicit iterations
Replies: 3
Views: 2461

Re: ALE implicit iterations

Hello, Thanks for the reply. My "implicit" is from the mesh deformation point of view: instead of deforming the mesh just once per time step and then jumping to the following time step, I would like to iterate several mesh deformations within the same time step in order to achieve converge...
by daniele
Thu Jul 08, 2021 11:12 am
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: ALE implicit iterations
Replies: 3
Views: 2461

ALE implicit iterations

Hello, In the frame of an ALE simulation, I use the cs_user_boundary_conditions-ale.f90 to impose a given displacement for the nodes of a wall. The cs_user_boundary_conditions-ale.f90 is read once at the beginning of each time step. The code performs the time step, then jumps to the following one an...
by daniele
Tue May 25, 2021 9:41 am
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: ALE implicit coupling error with EBRSM
Replies: 7
Views: 4494

Re: ALE implicit coupling error with EBRSM

Hello, Unfortunately there is no error file created beside the one describing exactly the same error found in the listing. The output file of the batch job gives the following error message (I have no error file created): ********************** Starting calculation ********************** -----------...
by daniele
Fri May 21, 2021 8:58 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: ALE implicit coupling error with EBRSM
Replies: 7
Views: 4494

Re: ALE implicit coupling error with EBRSM

Sorry I didn't get what you meant. The error file contains exactly the call stack details shown in my previous post. I had a look inside the run_solver.log and actually found something more: SIGTERM signal (termination) received. --> computation interrupted by environment. Call stack: 1: 0x2ab30488c...
by daniele
Fri May 21, 2021 5:34 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: ALE implicit coupling error with EBRSM
Replies: 7
Views: 4494

Re: ALE implicit coupling error with EBRSM

Hello Yvan, Thank you for your answer. I copied the error in my previous post, but maybe it was not uploaded... I copy it here again: Call stack: 1: 0x2ac8d66da748 <strdep_+0xdd3> (libsaturne-6.0.so) 2: 0x2ac8d66e17af <tridim_+0x40df> (libsaturne-6.0.so) 3: 0x2ac8d655ffd2 <caltri_+0x20f2> (libsaturn...
by daniele
Fri May 21, 2021 4:28 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: Lapack with v6
Replies: 4
Views: 4561

Re: Lapack with v6

Thank you very much Yvan.
I managed to properly link Lapack!
Best regards,
Daniele
by daniele
Fri May 21, 2021 4:27 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: ALE implicit coupling error with EBRSM
Replies: 7
Views: 4494

ALE implicit coupling error with EBRSM

Hello, I am facing always the same error as soon as I activate the ALE implicit coupling with a EBRSM simulation: Call stack: 1: 0x2ac8d66da748 <strdep_+0xdd3> (libsaturne-6.0.so) 2: 0x2ac8d66e17af <tridim_+0x40df> (libsaturne-6.0.so) 3: 0x2ac8d655ffd2 <caltri_+0x20f2> (libsaturne-6.0.so) 4: 0x2ac8d...
by daniele
Tue Apr 20, 2021 3:01 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: Lapack with v6
Replies: 4
Views: 4561

Re: Lapack with v6

Hello Yvan,

Thank you very much for your help.
I am not very good in compiling stuff, could you please help me further: what do I have to specify exactly for domain.compile_...? The location of the Lapack libraries etc?

Thanks a lot for your time.
Best regards,
Daniele
by daniele
Wed Apr 07, 2021 9:57 am
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: ALE simulation v5.0.3 vs v6.0.2 discrepancy
Replies: 1
Views: 1648

ALE simulation v5.0.3 vs v6.0.2 discrepancy

Hello, I have some problems in understanding the behavior of different versions of code_Saturne with ALE internal coupling simulations. I have performed a lot of ALE with internal coupling simulations with v5.0.3 in a quite straightforward way, without encountering inconsistencies. I switched to v6....