Search found 18 matches

by flyer
Mon Dec 30, 2013 5:15 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: turbomachinery in CS_3.2
Replies: 16
Views: 7270

Re: turbomachinery in CS_3.2

hello;
it seems that the mesh is good and the rotor is so far from the outlet, i think that the problem occurs at the interface boundary, calculations don't start if the face joining is not added in the GUI.
regards.
by flyer
Mon Dec 23, 2013 11:05 am
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: turbomachinery in CS_3.2
Replies: 16
Views: 7270

Re: turbomachinery in CS_3.2

hello, thank you, now it work. but during rotation i have some problems: incoming flow at outlet and the mesh is destructed at the boundary rotor/stator (please see attached file). for that calculations stop by casting this message in the listing file: "Jacobi: error (divergence) solving for ve...
by flyer
Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:27 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: turbomachinery in CS_3.2
Replies: 16
Views: 7270

Re: turbomachinery in CS_3.2

hello,
please find attached the "cs_user_turbomachinery.c" subroutine.
i update to the 3.2.1 version, and now i have a new message error:
Signal SIGSEGV (accès à une zone mémoire interdite) intercepté !

best regards.
by flyer
Tue Dec 17, 2013 4:10 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: turbomachinery in CS_3.2
Replies: 16
Views: 7270

Re: turbomachinery in CS_3.2

hello, thank you for the clarification; now i have an error message: **************************************************************************** cs_solver: cs_turbomachinery.c :619 : _select_rotor_cells: l'assertion « tbm->rotor_cells_c != ((void *)0) » a échoué. cs_solver: cs_turbomachinery.c :619...
by flyer
Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:11 am
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: turbomachinery in CS_3.2
Replies: 16
Views: 7270

turbomachinery in CS_3.2

hello, i have a problem with cell_criteria definition in cs_user_turbomachinery.c: i didn't understand what means the first raw "cylinder[0.0, 0.0, 0.0," for the second & the third i think that corresponds to rotation axis and velocity. note: my rotor is a cylindrical domain with a rad...
by flyer
Mon Apr 29, 2013 3:41 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: cs user source terme
Replies: 5
Views: 5497

Re: cs user source terme

thank's it's always the same thing even without the if (. true.) return I send you my subroutine and file compil.log when installing my cs3, it given an error in cgns instal and it proposed to installed - without-cgns!!! is that it is causing problem ??? thank you very very much compile.log cs_user_...
by flyer
Mon Apr 29, 2013 11:23 am
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: cs user source terme
Replies: 5
Views: 5497

Re: cs user source terme

hello thank you for your response for term source I used a constant source term S=AU+B A=0 B=cst crvimp(iel) = 0.d0 crvexp(1,iel)=cst if (ivar.eq.iu .or. ivar.eq.iv .or. ivar.eq.iw) then qdm = 100.d0 call getcel('rot', nlelt, lstelt) do iel = 1, nlet crvimp(1,1,iel) = 0.0d0 enddo do iel = 1, nlet cr...
by flyer
Sun Apr 28, 2013 12:08 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: cs user source terme
Replies: 5
Views: 5497

cs user source terme

Hello I ask you for help because I have problems with the new version of saturne CS3 in the applications of ustsns in cs-usersouceterm and the user-boundary. I have adapted the subroutine to this new version, they work in first sight! but after (1000 iteration)get back with my results but without th...
by flyer
Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:50 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: 1 degree of freedom
Replies: 1
Views: 1646

Re: 1 degree of freedom

hello,
you can try to give an hight stiffens to the two direction that you want to fix, and eliminate forces applied in these directions. (ex: for a needed motion in y direction: fluid_fx=fluid_fz=0 and kx,kz>>ky)
best regards.
by flyer
Tue Feb 05, 2013 5:19 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: Fluid Structure Interaction
Replies: 7
Views: 4465

Re: Fluid Structure Interaction

Hello ;
thank you luca ;) ,
do you mean modifying the routine called (usstr2) ?
And what about defining a rigid buddy around the structure ? I usually use a hight mesh viscosity but for large displacement I had negative volume.
good luck.