Search found 72 matches

by JamesMcNaughton
Mon Jul 09, 2012 3:25 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: turbine modelling
Replies: 123
Views: 54245

Re: turbine modelling

The top picture you post has one cell between the outer wall and the interface. This will not be enough to get anywhere near realistic solutions. Try refining your mesh, it needn't be too far but your current mesh is not suitable. I'm not familiar with Salome's capabilities but look at putting prism...
by JamesMcNaughton
Mon Jul 09, 2012 2:31 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: turbine modelling
Replies: 123
Views: 54245

Re: turbine modelling

You should refine your mesh quite a bit
by JamesMcNaughton
Mon Jul 09, 2012 2:02 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: turbine modelling
Replies: 123
Views: 54245

Re: turbine modelling

If you show some pictures of the flow-field I might be able to suggest something depending on what the problem is.
by JamesMcNaughton
Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:40 am
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: turbine modelling
Replies: 123
Views: 54245

Re: turbine modelling

You don't call things inlet outlet etc in Salome, as per your previous posts you have things called Face_02 etc, you define what they are in saturne. It's not imaginary (maybe this is the wrong word), it's the interface between your coupling it just isn't a wall or inlet or anything, its just an int...
by JamesMcNaughton
Sun Jul 08, 2012 9:26 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: turbine modelling
Replies: 123
Views: 54245

Re: turbine modelling

Hi, For this type of coupling you should not couple at a boundary face but an an interface in the fluid domain. The interface is not a wall but an imaginary boundary between the rotating and stationary parts. So in your image ( http://code-saturne.org/forum/download/file.php?id=126 ) you will be mes...
by JamesMcNaughton
Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:12 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: turbine modelling
Replies: 123
Views: 54245

Re: turbine modelling

Hi, The coupling will either give the rotating part a Coriolis source term (icorio=1) or rotate the inner mesh (icorio=0) based on omegax/y/z. At present you give Coriolis source term to the whole fluid volume - so it thinks the outer vanes are rotating too. The velocity vectors you plot are the rel...
by JamesMcNaughton
Fri Jul 06, 2012 12:12 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: turbine modelling
Replies: 123
Views: 54245

Re: turbine modelling

As you say saturne only models the fluid and only needs to know there is a wall. You just define the turbine boundary as a wall (iparoi) in usclim.

Have a look at some of the examples to see what I mean but you only need to mesh the fluid.

cheers
by JamesMcNaughton
Fri Jul 06, 2012 9:25 am
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: turbine modelling
Replies: 123
Views: 54245

Re: turbine modelling

Hey, so in 2D this is the meshing strategy you should have. You don't need to mesh the solid outer blades just the fluid around them. Likewise for the inner turbine. So two meshes separated by the cylindrical interface (it doesn't need to be cylindrical but if you want to rotate the mesh it will). A...
by JamesMcNaughton
Fri Jul 06, 2012 9:20 am
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: turbine modelling
Replies: 123
Views: 54245

Re: turbine modelling

Regarding the meshing you only need to mesh the fluid which I don't think you have. I'll draw a picture it might be easier.,.
by JamesMcNaughton
Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:34 pm
Forum: code_saturne usage
Topic: turbine modelling
Replies: 123
Views: 54245

Re: turbine modelling

The mesh is quite coarse. However, there might be an issue with the way you have meshed it (or I have misunderstood the flow). Is the dark blue region meant to be solid even though it is meshed? Also where is the interface between the two regions? I expected that the dark blue was just an outer wall...