Hello everyone,
I am trying to run a LES study of a buoyancy driven flow. Previously I ran a few RANS simulations of the same case, and I observed that most of the fields showed a chequered pattern unless I activated IPHYDR and IPUCOU.
In a first exploratory LES, I am back to the same situation ...
Search found 32 matches
- Wed Feb 28, 2018 11:03 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: LES for natural convection - chequered fields
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2344
- Tue Apr 25, 2017 9:57 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: No shear wall
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5473
Re: No shear wall
Hello,
The boundary temperature I plotted is that output by the calculation, with the postprocessing activated in the GUI in Surface solution control. I attached the temperature field on a mid plane. As you see it is rather irregular, and also the time evolution at my monitoring points is unstable ...
The boundary temperature I plotted is that output by the calculation, with the postprocessing activated in the GUI in Surface solution control. I attached the temperature field on a mid plane. As you see it is rather irregular, and also the time evolution at my monitoring points is unstable ...
- Mon Apr 24, 2017 2:15 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: No shear wall
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5473
Re: No shear wall
Hello Yvan,
The calculation itself is very unstable, but I thought that it could be either independent or even caused by the boundary problem. But that is because I assumed that imposing a Dirichlet boundary condition would force the boundary temperature to the chosen value no matter what happens ...
The calculation itself is very unstable, but I thought that it could be either independent or even caused by the boundary problem. But that is because I assumed that imposing a Dirichlet boundary condition would force the boundary temperature to the chosen value no matter what happens ...
- Thu Apr 20, 2017 11:31 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: No shear wall
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5473
No shear wall
Hello everyone,
I need to impose a "no-shear wall" boundary condition with uniform temperature in a test simulation. I have found a ready-made recipe for it in the user manual (for version 4, in the notes at page 74), which I implemented as follows in cs_user_boundary_conditions:
if (constant ...
I need to impose a "no-shear wall" boundary condition with uniform temperature in a test simulation. I have found a ready-made recipe for it in the user manual (for version 4, in the notes at page 74), which I implemented as follows in cs_user_boundary_conditions:
if (constant ...
- Wed Apr 19, 2017 11:09 am
- Forum: Installation issues
- Topic: Hdf5 linking not working
- Replies: 7
- Views: 12799
Re: Hdf5 linking not working
Hello,
Sorry for the late reply, I attached config.status and the Makefile in my build directory (hope is the one you meant). I had a glance at them and the variables concerning hdf5 seem reasonable. Hopefully you can get more from them.
Thank you again and regards,
Cosimo
Sorry for the late reply, I attached config.status and the Makefile in my build directory (hope is the one you meant). I had a glance at them and the variables concerning hdf5 seem reasonable. Hopefully you can get more from them.
Thank you again and regards,
Cosimo
- Thu Apr 13, 2017 5:05 pm
- Forum: Installation issues
- Topic: Hdf5 linking not working
- Replies: 7
- Views: 12799
Re: Hdf5 linking not working
Hi,
It worked when I added /opt/Salome/BINARIES-UB16.04/hdf5/lib, which I had already tried but I did not think of restarting the GUI.
Thanks for that. Can you suggest me the modification to the script?
Regards,
Cosimo
It worked when I added /opt/Salome/BINARIES-UB16.04/hdf5/lib, which I had already tried but I did not think of restarting the GUI.
Thanks for that. Can you suggest me the modification to the script?
Regards,
Cosimo
- Thu Apr 13, 2017 10:44 am
- Forum: Installation issues
- Topic: Hdf5 linking not working
- Replies: 7
- Views: 12799
Re: Hdf5 linking not working
Hi Yvan,
Many thanks for your answer. I am running Ubuntu 16.04.1, 64 bit.
The configure.log I posted is just what the configure command printed on the standard output, I did not use the installer. I am attaching config.log in the hope it is more helpful.
I am using Salome 8.2.0, the pre-compiled ...
Many thanks for your answer. I am running Ubuntu 16.04.1, 64 bit.
The configure.log I posted is just what the configure command printed on the standard output, I did not use the installer. I am attaching config.log in the hope it is more helpful.
I am using Salome 8.2.0, the pre-compiled ...
- Wed Apr 12, 2017 12:39 pm
- Forum: Installation issues
- Topic: Hdf5 linking not working
- Replies: 7
- Views: 12799
Hdf5 linking not working
Hello everyone,
I am trying to install the triplet Salome + Saturne + Syrthes on a new workstation, but I encounter a problem I never had in my previous installation.
I make use of Salome's libraries, and nothing seems to go wrong during the compilation: in particular, at the end of the configure ...
I am trying to install the triplet Salome + Saturne + Syrthes on a new workstation, but I encounter a problem I never had in my previous installation.
I make use of Salome's libraries, and nothing seems to go wrong during the compilation: in particular, at the end of the configure ...
- Thu Feb 16, 2017 11:40 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Discrepancy between debug and production versions
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3719
Re: Discrepancy between debug and production versions
Hello Yvan,
I think I have located the cause of the problem: in usipsu I called field_set_key_int but I had not initialized ifcvs. It is an old bug but it went unnoticed because it did not cause problems with my production installation. Perhaps uninitialized variables are set to 0 by my compiler ...
I think I have located the cause of the problem: in usipsu I called field_set_key_int but I had not initialized ifcvs. It is an old bug but it went unnoticed because it did not cause problems with my production installation. Perhaps uninitialized variables are set to 0 by my compiler ...
- Wed Feb 15, 2017 3:35 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Discrepancy between debug and production versions
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3719
Discrepancy between debug and production versions
Hello,
I am experiencing a rather peculiar problem using version 4.0.1: when I run my simulation using my debug install, I get an error I do not have when I use my production version.
The error occurs in iniva0: I tracked it down to the line:
call field_get_key_int (ivarfl(isca(iscal)), kivisl ...
I am experiencing a rather peculiar problem using version 4.0.1: when I run my simulation using my debug install, I get an error I do not have when I use my production version.
The error occurs in iniva0: I tracked it down to the line:
call field_get_key_int (ivarfl(isca(iscal)), kivisl ...