Thank you for your answer,
I indeed run in frozen velocity field so my Eulerian computation is a separate issue.
The block partitioning seems the best option for my special case, I'll see if I can rework my mesh numbering efficiently.
Search found 5 matches
- Fri Apr 26, 2013 2:45 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Split a domain as I wish
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3832
- Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:24 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Split a domain as I wish
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3832
Re: Split a domain as I wish
Ok, I found some options in the GUI in Calculation management/Performance tuning, but none gives me what I want.
My domain is a straight duct and I'd like partitions to be long and thin in the X direction. No ideas?
My domain is a straight duct and I'd like partitions to be long and thin in the X direction. No ideas?
- Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:47 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Split a domain as I wish
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3832
Split a domain as I wish
Hi,
I run a Lagrangian simulation in parallel but the way the domain is split doesn't help, is there some way to tell code_saturne how he should split the domain?
I run a Lagrangian simulation in parallel but the way the domain is split doesn't help, is there some way to tell code_saturne how he should split the domain?
- Thu Oct 04, 2012 12:17 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: custom boundary conditions with code_saturne 2.3
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3851
Re: custom boundary conditions with code_saturne 2.3
Thank you Yvan,
It seems to work!
And do you have any clue about why write(nfecra,*) doesn't write in the listing file?
It seems to work!
And do you have any clue about why write(nfecra,*) doesn't write in the listing file?
- Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:22 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: custom boundary conditions with code_saturne 2.3
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3851
custom boundary conditions with code_saturne 2.3
Hi, I try to apply some custom boundary conditions using cs_user_boundary_conditions.f90 with code_saturne 2.3 and, it doesn't work. There is no bug, but the boundary conditions actually applied are the ones set in the GUI instead of the ones I would like to set with the fortran file. Furthermore, I...