Yvan, thank you for the insight and the suggestions.
I've tried several options and CFL-Number choices. As the velocity magnitude in the current setup covers a large span, the CFL-Numbers are either much to large resulting in unphysical solutions or way to small and the checkerboarding occurs ...
Search found 16 matches
- Wed Oct 12, 2022 3:53 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Velocity Solution Artefacts
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7942
- Wed Aug 17, 2022 1:11 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Velocity Solution Artefacts
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7942
Re: Velocity Solution Artefacts
Dear Yvan,
thank you for the suggestion.
The CFL-Numbers seem to be in a valid range, There are a bit large in the tetrahedral region but shouldn't cause the checkerboard pattern.
Velocity-Z.png CFl.png
I've attached the XML-file and the logs. CS-Version 6.0.4
Thank you in advance.
Kind ...
thank you for the suggestion.
The CFL-Numbers seem to be in a valid range, There are a bit large in the tetrahedral region but shouldn't cause the checkerboard pattern.
Velocity-Z.png CFl.png
I've attached the XML-file and the logs. CS-Version 6.0.4
Thank you in advance.
Kind ...
- Tue Aug 16, 2022 11:01 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Velocity Solution Artefacts
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7942
Velocity Solution Artefacts
Hello,
in a very early stage of my CFD I could observe solution artefacts in the z-component of the velocity (the stripes in the solution), Bulk velocity (x-direction) is approx. 30m/s.
Vel-Artefacts.PNG
With ongoing solution process the solution worses and a pronounced pattern in the velocity ...
in a very early stage of my CFD I could observe solution artefacts in the z-component of the velocity (the stripes in the solution), Bulk velocity (x-direction) is approx. 30m/s.
Vel-Artefacts.PNG
With ongoing solution process the solution worses and a pronounced pattern in the velocity ...
- Tue Nov 17, 2020 3:26 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Mesh Refinement
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2077
Mesh Refinement
Hello,
applying cs_mesh_refine_simple() on meshes with periodic boundaries throws a sigsegfault during the refinement process (CS 6.0.4). Probably it can’t handle the ghost cells, since the refinement on the same mesh without periodic boundaries works well.
Do you have a recommendation for using ...
applying cs_mesh_refine_simple() on meshes with periodic boundaries throws a sigsegfault during the refinement process (CS 6.0.4). Probably it can’t handle the ghost cells, since the refinement on the same mesh without periodic boundaries works well.
Do you have a recommendation for using ...
- Mon Nov 09, 2020 9:57 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Gradient Calculation: Halo (Ghost) cells
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2512
Gradient Calculation: Halo (Ghost) cells
Hello,
I need to do some gradient caluculations in cs_user_postprocess.
Is it okay to fill the value array from which I calculate the gradient up to n_cells? Or do I have to take care on the ghost cells and should fill the array with n_cells_with_ghosts values?
A skeleton of my routine:
cs ...
I need to do some gradient caluculations in cs_user_postprocess.
Is it okay to fill the value array from which I calculate the gradient up to n_cells? Or do I have to take care on the ghost cells and should fill the array with n_cells_with_ghosts values?
A skeleton of my routine:
cs ...
- Thu Jun 18, 2020 8:38 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Imposed P-Outlet
- Replies: 12
- Views: 9446
Re: Imposed P-Outlet
Version 5.0.9
Kind regards,
Ralf
Kind regards,
Ralf
- Wed Jun 17, 2020 3:51 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Imposed P-Outlet
- Replies: 12
- Views: 9446
Re: Imposed P-Outlet
Thank you ,
seems to a problem of the code_saturne Version.
Comparing the parameter files I see no difference. Running your setup with my older 5.xx version i get the same false results using a 6.04 version i get the expected output.
thank you.
Kind regards
Ralf
seems to a problem of the code_saturne Version.
Comparing the parameter files I see no difference. Running your setup with my older 5.xx version i get the same false results using a 6.04 version i get the expected output.
thank you.
Kind regards
Ralf
- Tue Jun 16, 2020 4:53 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Imposed P-Outlet
- Replies: 12
- Views: 9446
Re: Imposed P-Outlet
Hello Yvan,
sorry for my late reply, I was in holiday.
Maybe I didn't get it. What I want is that in the upper channel the pressure is lower than in the lower channel and the pressure difference is about 10% (setup in Test.zip).
What I get is, independant of the variable "pressure" or "total ...
sorry for my late reply, I was in holiday.
Maybe I didn't get it. What I want is that in the upper channel the pressure is lower than in the lower channel and the pressure difference is about 10% (setup in Test.zip).
What I get is, independant of the variable "pressure" or "total ...
- Wed Jun 03, 2020 10:20 am
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Imposed P-Outlet
- Replies: 12
- Views: 9446
Re: Imposed P-Outlet
Dear Yvan,
I have attached my simplified Test-Case.
Kind regards,
Ralf
I have attached my simplified Test-Case.
Kind regards,
Ralf
- Tue Jun 02, 2020 3:39 pm
- Forum: code_saturne usage
- Topic: Imposed P-Outlet
- Replies: 12
- Views: 9446
Re: Imposed P-Outlet
Thank you, Yvan.
Following your suggestion I have changed BC_4 to an Imposed-P-Outlet, setting the Pressure to p = 1e5 and BC_2 to an imposed P-Outlet with p=1.1e5. This should force a pressure difference in the range of 10%.
Have look at the result Code_Saturne_Forum_3.png
Still not the expected ...
Following your suggestion I have changed BC_4 to an Imposed-P-Outlet, setting the Pressure to p = 1e5 and BC_2 to an imposed P-Outlet with p=1.1e5. This should force a pressure difference in the range of 10%.
Have look at the result Code_Saturne_Forum_3.png
Still not the expected ...