code_saturne User's Forum

Dear Support team, I've seen the following recommendation in Code_Saturne general documentation (in Atmospheric flows module part): In some case, the turbulent eddy viscosity can drop to unrealistically low values (especially with $k-\varepsilon$ model in stable atmospheric condition). In those case...

Hello Yvan, Thanks for your feedback. For the second point, I finally managed to activate and post-process "wall_distance" calculation from Code_Saturne in order to handle this topic easily in paraview. "wall_distance is not a default output so I had to activated it from user's subrou...

Dear all, I would have 2 questions related to Code_Saturne usage: 1) If I select a volume zone thanks to box[...] and that I want to impose in scalar value in this area, is 'volume' predifined symbol in the GUI the volume of the box[...] or the volume of the cells that are associated to box intercep...

Hello,

This message to confirm it was an installation issue on the cluster, everything seems to work fine now.

Kind regards

Hello Yvan, Please accept my apologizes if I have not followed the forum usage recommandations and provide the relevant logs. I've performed several tests localy with and without the GUI to understand some points and performance issues (much clearer now for procs and threads) and without the GUI on ...

And when looking at my run.cfg file, I have n_procs =5, what makes sense regarding what I initially wanted.

Hello,

I have made an additional test locally on my machine. I'm asking 5 processes with 1 thread per process and when looking at my log file, I can read:
Processors/node: 6
OpenMP threads : 4
I thought I would have respectively 5 and 1.
Could someone explain me this?
Kind regards
JCo

Dear support team, I'm currently trying to transfer runs prepared locally (using n_threads=xxx in run.cfg)) on a machine to hpc. When using slurm and restarting the calculation on hpc, I'm using n_procs= yyy in run.cfg but I'm facing errors due to the fact that the folder already exists in RESU. Sin...

Hello again,

I was considering that DFM would be more suitable than SGDH in case I use RIJ ssg turbulence, am I wrong on this point?

Kind regards

JCo

Thanks a lot for these feedbacks Yvan.